Abelardo De La Espriella, a right-wing outsider, won Colombia’s presidential election by less than 1% of the vote, defeating leftist Iván Cepeda by running a campaign on a tougher security strategy and more aggressive anti-drug trafficking measures.
De La Espriella received 12.959 million votes (49.7%) compared to Cepeda’s 12.708 million (48.7%), according to the nation’s electoral authority. His victory reflected a highly polarized electorate and represents the most recent rightward shift in Latin America’s politics. Earlier this month, De La Espriella was endorsed by U.S. President Donald Trump.
Cepeda and his close ally, outgoing President Gustavo Petro, cast doubt on the results, alleging irregularities without evidence. This election had Colombia’s highest turnout since the presidential runoff system was established in 1994. While Cepeda won in more departments (18 versus 14), De La Espriella secured a higher concentration of votes in territories with significant electoral weight, local newspaper El Tiempo reported. De La Espriella will take office on August 7.
AQ asked analysts to share their reactions and perspectives.
Sergio Guzmán
Director of Colombia Risk Analysis, a political risk consulting firm based in Bogotá
Abelardo De La Espriella has emerged as the virtual winner of Colombia’s presidential election, securing 12.9 million votes in a historically competitive second round. However, his narrow margin (around 250,000 votes) over Iván Cepeda has triggered unprecedented institutional uncertainty.
Cepeda is contesting the preliminary results and demanding a full tally, which will likely end in a recount, opening a tense transition period. Despite left-wing claims of irregularities, the electoral authority’s historical precision makes a reversal highly unlikely, and De La Espriella has already received early backing from international allies, including U.S. President Donald Trump.
De La Espriella’s narrow lead does not guarantee a mandate and suggests he will have to tone down his incendiary rhetoric and potentially water down a part of his ambitious agenda to succeed. Once in office, De La Espriella will face severe governance hurdles; lacking automatic legislative majorities, his party must build coalitions with traditional moderates to advance a radical, pro-business economic shock plan that includes cutting the state apparatus by 40%, resuming fracking, and eliminating some taxes.
His preferred strategy of governing through unilateral executive decrees and states of exception poses structural risks to Colombia’s checks and balances, setting the stage for future legal battles with the Constitutional Court and the State Council. Furthermore, De La Espriella’s promises to purge public bureaucracy and penalize the outgoing administration threaten to paralyze state agencies and provoke sustained social mobilization led by President Gustavo Petro’s base.
Internationally, De La Espriella will seek tighter security cooperation with the United States, potentially aligning Colombia with Washington’s “Shield of the Americas.” Ultimately, his term promises a high-friction environment balancing market-friendly reforms against severe institutional confrontation, judicial resistance, and deep social polarization.
María Paula Carvajal
Head of Latin America, Sovereign Credit Management, Citigroup
The outcome of the presidential election sets a new course for Colombia, though the path forward holds notable challenges. The success of the incoming administration will hinge on its ability to ensure governability, improve fiscal credibility, address security concerns, and rebuild confidence both at home and abroad.
Although De La Espriella won the presidency by a narrow margin, a divided Congress means he begins without a broad mandate. His effectiveness will likely depend on building coalitions, appointing a well-regarded cabinet, and turning campaign proposals into credible policies.
For investors and other observers, the focus will shift from politics to results. They will be watching to see whether the new administration can stabilize public finances, improve security, restore confidence in the health system, and support key sectors such as investment and energy. Regaining credibility with ratings agencies, markets, and multilateral institutions will also be a key indicator.
In the lead-up to the August 7 inauguration, the quality of the transition and early policy signals will be closely scrutinized. A constructive relationship with the United States and international financial institutions could help reinforce stability. Meanwhile, De La Espriella’s immediate priority will likely be to project competence and a capacity for governance. Gustavo Petro is expected to remain a dominant figure on the left. His approach to leading the opposition will be a major factor in determining whether Colombia enters a period of improved policy consensus or remains in a cycle of political polarization.
María Victoria Llorente
Director of the Fundación Ideas para la Paz think tank in Bogotá
Colombians turned out in massive numbers to vote on Sunday in one of the closest presidential elections in the country’s contemporary history. With a 63% turnout and an equally unprecedented narrow margin of just over 250,000 votes, the right-wing ticket of Abelardo De La Espriella and José Manuel Restrepo has emerged as the winner. The official result is still pending and will be announced in the coming hours, but based on previous elections, it is expected to confirm the preliminary count without major surprises.
Contrary to the fears that had been fueled throughout the campaign by President Gustavo Petro himself—whose progressive political project was at stake—the strength of Colombia’s electoral institutions has once again been demonstrated. The opposition’s fears of institutional breakdown and of street mobilizations by supporters of political continuity in the event of a defeat have, so far, not materialized.
One of the most complex legacies of this election is the deepening division of the country into two political projects that their supporters view as mutually exclusive. On one side is De La Espriella, with a libertarian economic platform focused on restoring state authority and security nationwide. On the other side is Cepeda, who advocates refining state-led policies to reduce social inequalities and pursue a strategy of “total peace” based on negotiations with all illegal armed groups—policies that have been promoted by the Petro administration.
This divide is also reflected geographically. Areas such as the Pacific coast, where major social and ethnic disparities are concentrated, voted for Cepeda by margins exceeding 80%. Meanwhile, in regions such as Norte de Santander on the border with Venezuela, where a security crisis has persisted due to conflicts among armed groups, citizens overwhelmingly supported De La Espriella.
The narrow electoral margin leaves the country caught between these two visions. Meeting the pressing needs for security, development, and territorial inclusion will require extensive dialogue and building trust between opposing sides. For now, the speeches delivered by both candidates after the initial results moved away from the campaign’s inflammatory tone and instead conveyed messages of unity and respect for democracy and differing views—signals that open the door to new possibilities.
Diego Pereira
Chief Economist of South America (ex-Brazil) at JP Morgan
Abelardo De La Espriella’s narrow victory has reshaped Colombia’s political terrain from the outset. A one-point win leaves Gustavo Petro’s coalition (Pacto Histórico) with enough support to contest the legitimacy of the electoral process through certification, while elevating figures like Cepeda into a credible, organized opposition. The result is an incoming government that will face sustained political friction at precisely the moment it seeks to establish authority. Delivering reforms under these conditions risks dilution, delay, or outright gridlock.
The new administration will take office amid an extremely challenging fiscal situation and a limited political mandate for a frontloaded adjustment. De La Espriella’s program commits to strict fiscal rule compliance and to a strengthened, more independent Colombian Autonomous Committee for the Fiscal Rule (CARF) with greater power to constrain executive and legislative overspending. On spending, it proposes consolidating ministries from 19 to 10, eliminating thousands of public-sector positions, merging redundant agencies, and reducing the “parallel payroll.” On revenue, it proposes simplifying the tax code while modernizing DIAN (the national tax and customs authority) with AI-driven enforcement to address evasion.
The most consequential near-term shift in Colombia’s external posture is geopolitical rather than tariff-driven. De La Espriella has explicitly committed to aligning domestic security policy with the Trump administration’s counter-narcotics doctrine and to joining a proposed regional “Shield of the Americas” security architecture. He has described the bilateral relationship as a partnership between “two nations united by shared civilizational interests.” Trump’s own endorsement framed a De La Espriella presidency as one that would grow trade, reduce illegal migration, and restore order.
That said, the realignment is not friction-free for trade specifically. De La Espriella has also indicated he would seek to revisit terms of the U.S.-Colombia free trade agreement that are seen as damaging to sensitive domestic sectors (dairy production in particular), a populist-protectionist instinct that sits in tension with the broader free-market thrust of the
rest of the program. We read this as a modest, sector-specific risk rather than a threat to the FTA architecture itself.
On multilateral engagement, the posture is more disruptive: De la Espriella has said he is “seriously evaluating” withdrawal from the UN and OAS, a position that, if pursued, would mark a clean break from six decades of foreign policy continuity.
We see governability, rather than policy direction, as the dominant source of uncertainty for the new government set to start on August 7.
Brian Winter
Editor-in-Chief of Americas Quarterly
This was the closest runoff election in Colombia’s history. Abelardo was expecting a bigger mandate and even took the unusual step Saturday of issuing a written warning to Congress not to obstruct his agenda. The left emerges from this energized, aggrieved and where it’s often happiest — the opposition. It could be a rocky four years.
To understand how Abelardo will fare, I’d ask: Will he follow the path of Jair Bolsonaro, or Javier Milei? Both were outsiders who staged “hostile takeovers” of the establishment right in their countries, as Abelardo just has. Milei quickly formed an alliance with Mauricio Macri’s party, giving him a certain (if imperfect) ability to pass legislation and govern from Day 1. Bolsonaro, by contrast, spent his first year in office fighting the culture wars and lashing out at the traditional powers of Brasília, and never really recovered.
Abelardo has sent mixed signals about which path he might take. Given the narrow result, he may be wise to seek alliances not only with uribismo but other center and center-right forces, if he is to tackle Colombia’s tremendous security, economic and fiscal challenges.
Colombia’s Bukele? Abelardo De La Espriella Surges Ahead
The right-wing frontrunner in Colombia’s election tells AQ he’s an “odd fish, but not a dangerous one,” and addresses questions about his past.
In Colombia’s Election, Two Conservatives Fight to Face Cepeda
The race between De La Espriella and Valencia will likely define a potential presidential runoff.
