Politics, Business & Culture in the Americas

Quiet Diplomacy at Americas Summit Can Pay Dividends for Climate Talks

Reading Time: 3 minutes

The Summit of the Americas in Panama this week could produce public performances worthy of an Academy Award nomination. Following recent efforts to re-establish diplomatic ties between the U.S. and Cuba, Presidents Barack Obama and Raúl Castro may stage a carefully choreographed handshake.

This eagerly anticipated moment could usher in a new chapter of U.S.–Latin American relations, as leaders south of the Rio Grande have repeatedly called for an end to U.S. aggression against Cuba. However, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro could upset the party by criticizing recent U.S. sanctions against Venezuela, which have been unanimously rejected by the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC).

Yet beyond the theatrics, there could be very important diplomatic exchanges behind the scenes, which could prove pivotal for the world’s response to global climate change.

The United Nations climate change negotiations are headed towards a major deadline this December in Paris to create a new global agreement. The Summit of the Americas presents an ideal place for the U.S. and Latin American and Caribbean leaders to candidly and privately discuss the issue.Many governments in the Western Hemisphere are taking proactive steps on climate change. Several Latin American countries—including Mexico, Chile, Brazil, and Ecuador—are adopting national climate policies and legislation to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to climate impacts. The U.S. has followed suit, with President Obama steering his agencies to reduce emissions from power generation and improve vehicle fuel efficiency.

But what can the U.S. and Latin America and the Caribbean do together? In 2009, the U.S. launched its Energy and Climate Partnership of the Americas (ECPA) to make progress on the deployment of clean energy and to reduce energy poverty across the hemisphere.  The ECPA has conducted scores of workshops and technical exchanges involving most countries in the hemisphere.

But until late last month, there was little to come from the ECPA’s important yet modest results. President Obama and Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto changed that when they announced plans to launch a clean energy and climate policy task force.  

These significant efforts at the national and regional level present useful conditions from which to have constructive conversations on climate change at the Summit of the Americas.

Climate change has become a high-level issue for President Obama, who has been working quietly for months in the attempt to build progress toward a new climate agreement in Paris. Similarly, Latin American countries are committed to the UN climate talks.

Yet despite consensus between the U.S. and Latin America and Caribbean that climate change is a grave threat, there are important differences in opinion about how the problem should be tackled.

Latin America and the Caribbean favor a “legally binding agreement” on climate, whereas the U.S. is only willing to back an “agreement,” given the hostility of a Republican-led Congress to a new global treaty. Latin American and Caribbean countries are demanding that rich countries, including the U.S., provide climate finance and technology transfer in order to make the transition to low-carbon economies and adapt to climate impacts.

Since developing countries will have to act on climate change without the benefit of cheap fossil fuels and achieve prosperity even as the climate becomes less predictable, such funding is well-justified.

However, despite these difficulties at the UN climate negotiations, the U.S.–China Joint Announcement on Climate Change last November and the recent formation of the U.S.–Mexico task force demonstrates that climate diplomacy between the North and South can achieve results. It could also yield a new affinity grouping for the U.S. in the negotiations—other nations seeking to focus on “benefit sharing, not just burden-sharing.”

Latin American leaders such as Chile’s Michelle Bachelet and Mexico’s Enrique Peña Nieto could bring together leaders from the U.S., Brazil, Peru, and other countries to discuss these issues. A private gathering could prove constructive for building trust and discussing areas of consensus and cooperation, given most of the world’s leaders will likely attend the Paris conference.

The U.S. and Latin American and Caribbean countries can discuss their progress on their national contributions on climate change, which are being submitted to the UN this year—and can debate whether they are sufficiently ambitious and based on a transparent and participatory process. Talks can also address how these contributions can become more ambitious in the coming decades to keep the world on a trajectory to stay below 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) of warming.

The U.S. can build on the advances of the Energy and Climate Partnership of the Americas during President Obama’s remaining time in office. Hemispheric action could focus on capitalizing on the enormous potential of renewable energy in the Americas and building cleaner and more sustainable cities. Both can contribute to building prosperity while delivering important benefits for development, health and security.

President Obama views progress on combating climate change as an important part of his legacy. Latin American and Caribbean leaders are also advancing national climate policies and demanding strong global action. The Summit of the Americas is an excellent setting to bring these voices together to build further progress. A successful outcome in Paris this December could depend on it.

All opinions expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the authors. 

More from AQ:

The U.S. and Cuba are rebuilding their relationship, but will Cubans find a way to mend ties with each other?

Richard E. Feinberg argues that better U.S.-Cuba relations will improve the U.S.’ image throughout the region.


Like what you've read? Subscribe to AQ for more.
Any opinions expressed in this piece do not necessarily reflect those of Americas Quarterly or its publishers.
Sign up for our free newsletter