Politics, Business & Culture in the Americas

Congress Postpones Vote on Media Law in Ecuador



Yesterday the president of Ecuador’s National Assembly, Fernando Cordero, announced via Twitter that voting on communications legislation advanced by the government would be postponed indefinitely, due to a lack of quorum. “The 124 assembly members are not all present, so I would prefer to convene another day,” Cordero said.

The legislation to be voted on, known as the Ley de Comunicación, would substantially reduce the percentage of radio and television outlets distributed among the private and public sectors. Voting was previously postponed on April 11, 2012. Under the terms of the proposed legislation, 34 percent of radio and TV frequencies would be allocated to community media, 33 percent to public media, and 33 percent to the private sector—which currently controls 85 percent of radio frequencies and 71 percent of TV frequencies, according to the State Superintendent of Telecommunications. The legislation also creates a five-member regulatory board with authority to place penalties on media sources that refuse to modify published information.

César Rodríguez, an opposition member of Congress, said in a statement to the press, “They do not have the votes to censor freedom of expression in Ecuador,” referring to the 63 votes that the ruling Alianza País would need to pass the legislation. (The coalition currently controls 53 seats in the National Assembly.)

Further criticism came from legislator Tomás Zevallos, who presented a motion (accepted in April) to vote on each of the bill’s 128 articles individually, arguing that the law has ambiguous sections and accusing the administration of using the media to advance the political agenda of the government. María Paula Romo, founding member and political activist of the “Ruptura de los 25,” a progressive political movement, submitted observations on the text of the law in which she questioned whether it would determine certain ethical principles that fall outside the scope of legal regulation.

Like what you've read? Subscribe to AQ for more.
Any opinions expressed in this piece do not necessarily reflect those of Americas Quarterly or its publishers.
Sign up for our free newsletter