Politics, Business & Culture in the Americas

Colombian Government Again Rules Out Truce

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Thursday marked the conclusion of the third round of peace talks between the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia—FARC) and the Colombian government in Havana, Cuba, with  no major progress made toward ending this long-standing conflict as the Colombian government continued to rule out a ceasefire with the FARC to gain greater peace.

Humberto de la Calle, head of the Colombian government’s peace negotiation team, declared in a press conference that he would rule out a ceasefire with the FARC until definitive peace agreements were set. “We want peace, but not at any cost. Not if as a result of the conversations the guerrillas are able to get stronger and continue to wage war.” January 20 marked the end of the two-month-long unilateral ceasefire on behalf of the FARC.

He also cited that the round of discussions should be instrumental in avoiding further guerilla operations. “Once the conflict ends and the FARC are reintegrated into society, they are eligible to have physical and legal guarantees, but this will not happen prior to a solid partnership. Politics and weapons should not be combined.”

The FARC, however, are pushing for land reform and social development investments. During this latest round of negotiations, the FARC emphasized the need for greater support for food production to meet basic nutritional needs and proposed that 25 million hectares (62 million acres) of land, more than 20 percent of the country, be handed over to the country’s poor.

Progress is likely to be made confidentially during negotiations to facilitate honest and impactful discussion, according to De la Calle.  He stated said that peace processes do not come to fruition if facilitated through the media, and that the negotiating team will maintain periodic announcements of progress.

Tags: Ceasefire, FARC
Like what you've read? Subscribe to AQ for more.
Any opinions expressed in this piece do not necessarily reflect those of Americas Quarterly or its publishers.
Sign up for our free newsletter